As i see around
….From times immemorial it is the
ability to accommodate, adjust, adapt which is at the forefront of
development..even the Darwin theory was ..the fittest survived .To be the
fittest ..one has to accommodate, adapt, adjust .Be it a city, be it a human
being, be it a machine..be it a relationship.
A relationship requires a person
to accommodate to the changing circumstances, adapt to the habits and behavior,
and adapt to keep the relationship going on.
A city has to go through the same
and accommodate the changing demographics, adjust to the behaviour and adapt to
the expectations of its seemingly “intelligent, civilized” population. A
machine, a mobile is successful only because it is continuously adapting itself
till it becomes personalized..
When there is so much of
accommodating, adjusting, adapting why do people still like actions and people
who rebel- an Aamir Khan who boycotts functions, a Salman Khan who does not
need social institutions to prove his acceptance and popularity.
Even though evolution, education, societal
norms makes more prototypes (that is why companies choose similar groups of
behavior patterns..programs most watched..high TVRs/clothes more popular/social
norms, accepted behavior that the majority of people accept) -Why would we let
go of individuality?
Why does being accepted mean that
one has to adjust and adapt once own way of thinking?
Maybe one can accommodate, adapt,
adjust most things but not the individuality of what you are ..be it a human
being, a city or a historical representation.
Adapt and adjust ..accomodate for
reasons known to you..but to loose yourself
till you know no more what you were ; and you do not recognize the face
in the mirror ….
….maybe this is not the way ..for
years afterwards ..you would look in the rear view mirror and think ..of what
you left behind. Take care..